Which Philly do I have? - EH Scott Radio Enthusiasts2024-03-28T11:11:16Zhttps://ehscott.ning.com/forum/topics/which-philly-do-i-have?commentId=3925821%3AComment%3A57530&xg_source=activity&feed=yes&xn_auth=noThanks, Norman! That does lo…tag:ehscott.ning.com,2017-04-08:3925821:Comment:574292017-04-08T17:43:59.522ZWilliam David Howardhttps://ehscott.ning.com/profile/WilliamDavidHoward
<p>Thanks, Norman! That does look like my radio. Now I know what dial glass to look for. The DG-118D at Radio Daze sounds right, but I'll get a photo from them to be sure.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
<p>Thanks, Norman! That does look like my radio. Now I know what dial glass to look for. The DG-118D at Radio Daze sounds right, but I'll get a photo from them to be sure.</p>
<p>Dave</p> Dave:
Your Philharmonic is an…tag:ehscott.ning.com,2017-04-08:3925821:Comment:576092017-04-08T17:10:15.715ZNorman S Braithwaitehttps://ehscott.ning.com/profile/NormanSBraithwaite
<p>Dave:</p>
<p>Your Philharmonic is an AM Beam-of-Light version with logging vernier described in service literature as the revised Philharmonic. Photos of the dial can be found at <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/kb1awv/sets/72157631388706840/" target="_blank">https://www.flickr.com/photos/kb1awv/sets/72157631388706840/</a> (scroll down). Your chassis does not have FM.</p>
<p>Norman</p>
<p>Dave:</p>
<p>Your Philharmonic is an AM Beam-of-Light version with logging vernier described in service literature as the revised Philharmonic. Photos of the dial can be found at <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/kb1awv/sets/72157631388706840/" target="_blank">https://www.flickr.com/photos/kb1awv/sets/72157631388706840/</a> (scroll down). Your chassis does not have FM.</p>
<p>Norman</p> I have uploaded 3 pix to My P…tag:ehscott.ning.com,2017-04-08:3925821:Comment:575362017-04-08T17:07:10.221ZWilliam David Howardhttps://ehscott.ning.com/profile/WilliamDavidHoward
<p>I have uploaded 3 pix to My Photos. In comparison to FIG. 8, there are no "FM tubes" on the RH side in my photo, nor is there a VR-150 at the back. Does this help? Thanks!</p>
<p>Dave</p>
<p>(William David Howard)<br></br><br></br> <cite>Kent King said:</cite></p>
<blockquote cite="http://ehscott.ning.com/forum/topics/which-philly-do-i-have#3925821Comment57530"><div><div class="xg_user_generated"><p>Dave - Can you post a few pictures of the chassis? It may help to determine if it isn't the FM…</p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I have uploaded 3 pix to My Photos. In comparison to FIG. 8, there are no "FM tubes" on the RH side in my photo, nor is there a VR-150 at the back. Does this help? Thanks!</p>
<p>Dave</p>
<p>(William David Howard)<br/><br/> <cite>Kent King said:</cite></p>
<blockquote cite="http://ehscott.ning.com/forum/topics/which-philly-do-i-have#3925821Comment57530"><div><div class="xg_user_generated"><p>Dave - Can you post a few pictures of the chassis? It may help to determine if it isn't the FM set. I'm almost certain it is an FM set (broken dial is correct). Reason is...BB443 was built on 22-Aug-1942. So your set was probably built during the summer of '42 also, making it a very late Philly after the war started. Virtually all of these sets were FM chassis. I'm also not surprised at variations: Scott built a few Phillies, Phantoms and Laureates after the WPB told companies to re-tool for the war. They were using available parts and so there were a lot of variations in how the sets were built.</p>
<p>Kent</p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote> Dave - Can you post a few pic…tag:ehscott.ning.com,2017-04-08:3925821:Comment:575302017-04-08T15:11:29.874ZKent Kinghttps://ehscott.ning.com/profile/KentKing
<p>Dave - Can you post a few pictures of the chassis? It may help to determine if it isn't the FM set. I'm almost certain it is an FM set (broken dial is correct). Reason is...BB443 was built on 22-Aug-1942. So your set was probably built during the summer of '42 also, making it a very late Philly after the war started. Virtually all of these sets were FM chassis. I'm also not surprised at variations: Scott built a few Phillies, Phantoms and Laureates after the WPB told companies to re-tool for…</p>
<p>Dave - Can you post a few pictures of the chassis? It may help to determine if it isn't the FM set. I'm almost certain it is an FM set (broken dial is correct). Reason is...BB443 was built on 22-Aug-1942. So your set was probably built during the summer of '42 also, making it a very late Philly after the war started. Virtually all of these sets were FM chassis. I'm also not surprised at variations: Scott built a few Phillies, Phantoms and Laureates after the WPB told companies to re-tool for the war. They were using available parts and so there were a lot of variations in how the sets were built.</p>
<p>Kent</p>